Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 15:07:02 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for review: build infrastructure for Clang Message-ID: <4BF1BE06.3050008@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201005180000.08299.max@love2party.net> References: <20100514152408.GN56080@hoeg.nl> <20100517092628.GC56080@hoeg.nl> <4BF1B352.4030306@FreeBSD.org> <201005180000.08299.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/17/10 15:00, Max Laier wrote: > On Monday 17 May 2010 23:21:22 Doug Barton wrote: >> On 05/17/10 02:26, Ed Schouten wrote: >>> * Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> lib/clang/..., as it is done for bind ? >>> >>> So I guess that would lead to the following directory structure? >>> >>> - lib/clang/libclang.../ >>> - lib/clang/libllvm.../ >> >> Yes. >> >>> - usr.bin/clang/clang/ >>> - usr.bin/clang/tblgen/ >> >> I don't think we have any hierarchies like this in the tree currently. > > we do - e.g. usr.bin/bsdiff/{bsdiff,bspatch} and usr.sbin/acpi/* I can see > that the latter makes sense, but the former doesn't make immediate sense to > me. From my POV clang is more like acpi in this regard - at least for the > moment. Sorry I wasn't clear ... there are a few hierarchies for things that share common code (add usr.sbin/pkg_install to the list) but I didn't think that was the case here. If I'm wrong, sorry for the misinformation. Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BF1BE06.3050008>