Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:35:06 +0100 From: Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arflags cleanup Message-ID: <553C482F-9A67-4E60-9DBE-D5D6CA548D67@cederstrand.dk> In-Reply-To: <0693B91A-6320-4CE9-A6FA-821B290BB74C@bsdimp.com> References: <3D0FBCC4-743C-45B0-82E0-4C82501F7E60@cederstrand.dk> <A5F62693-7817-4A99-8D45-DC3CE1FAD83B@bsdimp.com> <E8A733AD-56DE-4FFA-8BA4-BE56D2052BDD@cederstrand.dk> <C331C11B-EC33-4E1E-9772-269077695334@cederstrand.dk> <0693B91A-6320-4CE9-A6FA-821B290BB74C@bsdimp.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Warner, Den 13/11/2012 kl. 03.26 skrev Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>: >> >> If there are no other objections, I'll try to both patches into the tree (I have no commit bit myself). > > You haven't answered my objections, so not yet. I haven't had a chance to see if this message actually answers my concerns though (my life has been busy). As I understood your objections, you were worried about the negative performance impact of loosing 'u', and the extra verbosity of loosing 'c'. The first patch attempts to clean up ar flags, so makefiles respect the global ARFLAGS if one is defined, without changing the default ARFLAGS in share/mk/sys.mk. The second patch changes the default from 'rl' to 'cru'. If this does not address your concerns, could you elaborate a bit more? Thanks, Erikhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?553C482F-9A67-4E60-9DBE-D5D6CA548D67>