Date: 18 May 1997 13:06:40 +0200 From: sec@42.org (Stefan `Sec` Zehl) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vim vs. nvi? Message-ID: <slrn5ntom0.hh4.sec@matrix.42.org> References: <19970516203228.50252@crh.cl.msu.edu> <Pine.GSO.3.95.970517175204.21528N-100000@tor-adm1.nbc.netcom.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Pine.GSO.3.95.970517175204.21528N-100000@tor-adm1.nbc.netcom.ca>, Brian Tao wrote: > > I guess the only real way is to have some people in core who are vi > > users to try it out and give it a spin and see what they think. I > > myself am definatly sold.. If not for the syntax coloring alone.. > Thumbs up from me. I can no longer function in standard vi or > nvi, and vim is one of the first things I install on every new FreeBSD > system I use (after tcsh, screen and ncftp2 ;-)). Jepp, i vote for vim, too :) - it comes right afte screen (with WINDOW_MAX increased :-) and zsh. CU, Sec -- Programs that make a computer worth to use: FreeBSD, zsh, mutt, wm2, procmail, vim, perl, less, LaTeX, fetch, slrn, screen, ssh, pgp, ircII
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrn5ntom0.hh4.sec>