Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:46:34 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk> To: Brandon Fosdick <bfoz@bfoz.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> Subject: Re[2]: Jail to jail network performance? Message-ID: <169892035.20050915104634@rulez.sk> In-Reply-To: <4328E7E5.5050803@bfoz.net> References: <432753CF.6020001@bfoz.net> <4327CA3C.6050403@geminix.org> <E1D91BF4-2EC3-4535-A83E-A0D136C87B5E@orthanc.ca> <20050914110102.W33820@fledge.watson.org> <4328E7E5.5050803@bfoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Brandon, Thursday, September 15, 2005, 5:17:57 AM, you wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: >> (1) Modifying the name space exclusion assumption for jails, so that the >> file system name spaces overlap. One way to do this is with nullfs. > nullfs looks interesting. I was thinking about sharing files > between jails using NFS, but it looks like nullfs would do the trick > with better performance. Although the bugs section of the man page > for mount_nullfs is rather scary. Does anyone have any experience > with it? Does it actually work? btw unionfs is interesting as well, but the BUGS section is pretty the same :) > If the point here is to make /tmp/mysql.sock show up in another > jail's file space, can I use a symlink instead? Can a jailed process > see the target of the symlink? I read that using such a symlinks has security impacts. -- Best regards DanGer, ICQ: 261701668 | e-mail protecting at: http://www.2pu.net/ http://danger.rulez.sk | proxy list at: http://www.proxy-web.com/ | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?169892035.20050915104634>