Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:24:09 +0200 From: Beat Siegenthaler <beat.siegenthaler@beatsnet.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WiFi HotSpot Message-ID: <4CBD63B9.3090805@beatsnet.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinGe0ZW%2BsNg060xdBHtMbPSSEdoWUTusVCk-rB-@mail.gmail.com> References: <4CBCCA35.1020607@locolomo.org> <E194A4DE220BBE4FAF3AB7C4E7EDA08601070F68@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> <9EA5C4ECCF740346B3FFB246D0AD05EA02693350@exchange.tcc.to> <AANLkTinGe0ZW%2BsNg060xdBHtMbPSSEdoWUTusVCk-rB-@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19.10.10 03:03, Adam Vande More wrote: > I would recommend staying away from m0n0wall. It's poorly supported now, > and buggy. Example: > http://forum.m0n0.ch/index.php?PHPSESSID=1t2d5fp3t82ghgc7a7crmd0653&topic=2025.15 > I see no evidence of "buggy" there. And are you really in the position to judge about "poor support" in a OSS project ;-) > it blocks NAT packets with both Keep-State and OOW set and it's not a lot of > fun to track down. > Agree. But there are other questions: Is telnet the state of art for this environment? Maybe a encryption Layer would make some points obsolete? > pfSense or rolling your own may be a better option. > Using both m0n0 and pfSense: Both have their flaws. And yes, if pfSense supports IPv6, i will drop my m0n0's Beat
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CBD63B9.3090805>