Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 12:30:38 -0500 From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing problems lpr/lpd misbehavior ? Message-ID: <20031123173038.GB34574@ussenterprise.ufp.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpbrr3rq7v.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200311231604.hANG4iCV042391@spider.deepcore.dk> <xzpbrr3rq7v.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message written on Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 05:42:44PM +0100, Dag-Erling S= m=F8rgrav wrote: > Sorry, but *you* are the "crappy port". CUPS is intentionally split > into several ports so that the parts that other ports depend on > (cups-base) can be installed separately from the front-end (cups-lpr) > and the only port that depends on the front-end is the meta-port, > which itself has no dependents. One thing I notice is if you select "KDE" during the install you get enough cups to print, but none of the command line front ends. I've helped about 20 people with this "problem". I'm not sure if a better solution is to make the "KDE" master target include the command line utilities or to just make cups into one bit port. However, as it works now it doesn't make a lot of sense. You're installing a huge windowing system but you skimp on a few hundred k of command line utilities that people expect to exist. --=20 Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org --Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/wO6+Nh6mMG5yMTYRAoKZAJ4w/9Qfx0R3eL/30+Esxc7+iY9CtQCcCNUr /voPSZT+TCk9IY1J8YvfMUw= =29rW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031123173038.GB34574>