Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Feb 1996 11:21:19 +0000
From:      rb@gid.co.uk (Bob Bishop)
To:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   duplicate messages
Message-ID:  <v01510101ad50afe07b55@[194.32.164.2]>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Er, I'm seeing large nos of dups in this list today. Eg:

>Original-Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org
>                   (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA25045 Tue, 20 Feb 1996
>                   18:10:05 -0800 (PST)
>PP-warning: Illegal Received field on preceding line
>Original-Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by
>                   freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA24934
>                   Tue, 20 Feb 1996 18:09:42 -0800 (PST)
>PP-warning: Illegal Received field on preceding line
>X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO
>                          protocol
>To: Naoki Hamada <nao@sbl.cl.nec.co.jp>
>cc: andreas@knobel.gun.de, hackers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: mbuf enhancement patch
>From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
>Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
>Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 18:09:45 -0800
>Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
>Precedence: bulk
>
>>>   We once had changes similar to the ones you've provided, except we had it
>>>so that the buffers over a certain threshold were returned back to
>>>malloc. [etc]

is the same as:

>Original-Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org
>                   (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA07503 Tue, 20 Feb 1996
>                   21:31:54 -0800 (PST)
>PP-warning: Illegal Received field on preceding line
>To: hackers@freebsd.org
>Path: freefall.freebsd.org!owner-freebsd-hackers
>From: davidg@Root.COM (David Greenman)
>Newsgroups: rtd.freebsd.hackers
>Subject: Re: mbuf enhancement patch
>Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 18:09:45 -0800
>Lines: 19
>NNTP-Posting-Host: seagull.rtd.com
>Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
>Precedence: bulk
>
>>>   We once had changes similar to the ones you've provided, except we had it
>>>so that the buffers over a certain threshold were returned back to
>>>malloc. [etc]


--
Bob Bishop              (01734) 774017  international code +44 1734
rb@gid.co.uk        fax (01734) 894254  between 0800 and 1800 UK





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v01510101ad50afe07b55>