Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 20:19:34 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r362444 - head/sbin/dump Message-ID: <20200620201934.GA8270@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <01000172d35c996f-523a3c65-2f6b-472e-ad04-070e2b22bfe0-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <202006202006.05KK6EqK016498@repo.freebsd.org> <01000172d35c996f-523a3c65-2f6b-472e-ad04-070e2b22bfe0-000000@email.amazonses.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 08:12:40PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: > Thanks for backing this out, Warner. I also appreciate it. > I'd like to change "slave" to "worker" here (which I think is a reasonably > neutral and entirely inoffensive term), and in the process perhaps make some > associated grammatical changes (since "enworker" is dubious at best). > > To avoid causing any further issues: If anyone objects to the word "worker" > please let me know in the next ~48 hours. I think there's enough people > reading svn-src-all that I can anticipate feedback now if anyone will care > deeply about that word. Please, just open a DR for that so all interested parties can participate and fine-tune particular grammar and language choices. Also, r362447 should be reverted on the same grounds as r362422. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200620201934.GA8270>