Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:26:08 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Diego Depaoli <trebestie@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, Martin Tournoij <carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705 Message-ID: <4A785310.6070109@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <83e5fb980908040459k2e533ab4o2d23b229f98b8ace@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090706014719.GG11993@lonesome.com> <070151759cb2aacd36a14eb4b318a435@xs4all.nl> <20090716181711.GC90253@comcast.net> <36957fedc04d840595162bb026a8ec62@xs4all.nl> <20090801114833.GA23826@lonesome.com> <83e5fb980908040459k2e533ab4o2d23b229f98b8ace@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Diego Depaoli wrote:
> There are too many ports and too few people who care them.
> IMHO the options are:
> - decrease the number of ports
We trim dead/useless ports all the time.
> - increase the number of volunteers/committers/testers...
This is the only valid answer for FreeBSD.
> - switch to a multi-level solution (e.g. Archlinux).
In DiegoBSD you should feel free to use any solution you think is
useful. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A785310.6070109>