Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 17:26:06 -0800 From: David Benfell <benfell@greybeard95a.com> To: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis@mcmanis.com> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@Freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBsd and SCO Message-ID: <20040307012606.GA2788@parts-unknown.org> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20040306153313.02786e48@66.125.189.29> References: <BAY4-F11FZ1HCONkTJD00019a5d@hotmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20040306153313.02786e48@66.125.189.29>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 15:34:52 -0800, Chuck McManis wrote: > Unlike the GPL, the BSD license has already been litigated (see AT&T vs The > Regents), there is quite a bit of clarity around the legality of the BSD > source. > Indeed it has. But SCO doesn't stand a chance with its suit against Linux either. So the impossibility of success is clearly not a deterrent. -- David Benfell, LCP benfell@parts-unknown.org --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/resume.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040307012606.GA2788>