Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 21:07:11 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201623] /usr/ports/graphics/dri fails on powerpc Message-ID: <bug-201623-21-INuRTukN0L@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-201623-21@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-201623-21@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D201623 --- Comment #6 from Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #4) A clang status update: clang 4 and clang 5 are better behaved for TARGET_ARCH=3Dpowerpc . There is a problem if clang built the system library code involved in handling thrown C++ exceptions (process crash). But there was a fix to the system ld to fix clang-based C++ exception operation when the system libraries are built by gcc (such as the system gcc 4.2.1 compiler): Roman Divacky rdivacky at freebsd.org wrote on Sat Oct 7 10:03:10 UTC 2017 : > In a followup to https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/20= 17-May/002961.html >=20=20 > I attempted to fix gnu ld in base to fix the wrongly set bit. >=20 > The following patch=20 > http://www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/ppc64.exceptions.fix.patch >=20 > switches a few computations to happen in 64bits instead of 32bit and fixe= s the > wrong personality/LDSA info in binaries. >=20 > As a result clang compiled/assembled c++ binaries with EH start to work f= or me. >=20 > Can someone verify this works for everyone? I can see the same cast in up= stream > binutils but in a couple more places, so this is probably not the final a= nswer > but is good enough for me. For more see: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/2017-October/003349.h= tml --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-201623-21-INuRTukN0L>