Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:15:23 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Wen Heping <wen@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese Makefile ports/chinese/wordpress-zh_CN Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ports/chinese/wordpress-zh_CN/files pkg-message.in Message-ID: <20100316081523.GA5632@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201003160714.o2G7EvZZ079924@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <201003160714.o2G7EvZZ079924@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:14:57AM +0000, Wen Heping wrote: > wen 2010-03-16 07:14:57 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > chinese Makefile > Added files: > chinese/wordpress-zh_CN Makefile distinfo pkg-descr > chinese/wordpress-zh_CN/files pkg-message.in > Log: > WordPress is a state-of-the-art semantic personal publishing platform > with a focus on aesthetics, web standards, and usability. Is there any strong reason behind `-zh_CN' suffix (like maybe there will be another WordPress in `chinese' category)? Otherwise this is redundant (see `german/wordpress' for example of localized WordPress port). To see the bogusness of `-zh_CN' suffix (both in port directory name and PKGNAMESUFFIX) just do: $ make -V PKGNAME zh-wordpress-zh_CN-2.9.2 ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100316081523.GA5632>