Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 16:57:19 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: drow@drow.net Cc: rone@bofh.noc.best.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tcl, ports Message-ID: <199801090057.QAA28454@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980108191719.3240A-100000@mars.abcinternet.net> (message from Dan Jacobowitz on Thu, 8 Jan 1998 19:18:40 -0500 (EST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Except, for instance, if you have compiled anything whose name contains
* tcl in /usr/src. It seems to me that using that many wildcards in an rm
* is just asking for angry admins.
That's why it's asking you to do it instead of doing it by itself. If
you are experienced enough to put something non-standard in /usr/src,
you are expected to know what you're doing.
Anyway, I am eagerly awaiting someone who's been running -current to
submit an updated checklist and diagnoses. (Not to pick on you Dan,
but why is it that the fix/complaint ratio is so low these days on the
FreeBSD lists?)
To start out, here's what I think is appropriate:
check for:
/usr/include/tcl.h /usr/lib/libtcl??.so.*.*
tell users to:
delete the above two
if they don't want system tcl, rm -rf /usr/{include,libdata}/tcl,
/usr/{lib,bin}/*tcl*, /usr/share/man/*n/*
run ldconfig -R
(I believe system tcl installs libtcl.so.*.* now.)
Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801090057.QAA28454>