Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 18:49:27 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222692] Source install shows using svn, not svnlite Message-ID: <bug-222692-9-TGz77iUkuw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-222692-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-222692-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222692 --- Comment #2 from bsd@haps.ca --- Barring some active discussion with timeline to remove svnlite (which I'm unaware of), what you're suggesting is to leave the handbook in an inconsis= tent state. Recalling how long the cvs->svn move took, maybe holding our breath waiting for svnlite to go away isn't recommended. The handbook is really t= he one place new users are urged to read prior to any discussion on mailing li= sts, newsgroups, irc, etc. Granted there is an issue with base system documenta= tion that 194910 attempts to address. That bug was filed nearly 3 years ago. system. Referencing 191163: a patch to update svnlite documentation makes a lot of sense! Is there anything stopping that, or is it just on the giant 'nobody= 's submitted a patch for this yet' list? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-222692-9-TGz77iUkuw>