Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:01:22 +0200 From: Adam Pordzik <adampordzik@gmx.de> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Packagename of openldap WITH_SASL (e.g) Message-ID: <4310E2B2.5030001@gmx.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, I think it is generally no good idea of an OpenLDAP port with altered "sasl" name. Here I have 8 ports/packages which depends of "openldap22-client", not "openldap22-sasl-client". The only is openldap22-server, which I've built with WITH_SASL So the package-names becomes "openldap22-server" and "openldap-sasl-client", and I had to add a proper line to +REQUIRED_BY by each new package added to the system. Same with apache+modssl and maybe other. There are so many ports now, that it would be much more concise NOT to create so many "sub-ports". A --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4310E2B2.5030001>