Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 02:56:30 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov@syntrex.com> Cc: netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Fwd: [BUG] BSD libc fseek bug] Message-ID: <20011024025629.A18932@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <3BD5A90C.C310E49A@syntrex.com> References: <3BD5A90C.C310E49A@syntrex.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 19:29:48 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > > links describing a problem in newlib's > fseek implementation (this one is actually > BSD derived code). It seems this problem > currently exists in *BSDs too - I > didnt actually have the opportunity to test > it myself, but I've looked at the FreeBSD > and OpenBSD implementations of fseek and > it seems they have the problem too. > > The first link contains a description of > the problem and testcase, the second one > contains my observations on the problem: > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2001-10/msg01211.html > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2001-10/msg01298.html The bug is fixed in FreeBSD-current stdio.c v1.19, two-lines fix setting __SMOD of non-zero seek. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011024025629.A18932>