Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 13:21:56 -0400 From: adhir@forumone.com To: "'Russell L. Carter'" <rcarter@pinyon.org>, <crossd@cs.rpi.edu>, <dot@dotat.at> Cc: <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: SMP and threads... Message-ID: <D1E51FFB3744D311973A00104BD1D6BE010EBA@PLUTO> In-Reply-To: <D1E51FFB3744D311973A00104BD1D6BE2D71@PLUTO>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why haven't changes like these been committed? > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of > Russell L. Carter > Sent: Friday, August 06, 1999 12:10 PM > To: crossd@cs.rpi.edu; dot@dotat.at > Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: SMP and threads... > > > > |"David E. Cross" <crossd@cs.rpi.edu> wrote: > |>I have a threaded appilcation that is only running on one > processor. > |>I remember there was discussion about this in the past, and > there was a > |>solution, I think it involved a patch. > |> > |>Any pointers? > | > |http://lt.tar.com > > And don't be turned off by the "outdated" tunnel Richard stuck > up there, delete the two references to deferred signals in > the libc_r code that gets copied over into the port. > Then you get a thread implementation that still works better > than libc_r for things like TAO. (Although I haven't had > a chance to rerun the tests with the libc_r changes this > week). > > Russell > > | > |Tony. > |-- > |f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net e pluribus unix > | > | > |To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > |with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > | > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D1E51FFB3744D311973A00104BD1D6BE010EBA>