Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:51:29 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org, "Michael W. Lucas" <mwlucas@michaelwlucas.com> Subject: Re: gbde destroy doesn't match man page? Message-ID: <78350.1409089889@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <201408261723.53428.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20140820215522.GA92455@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <2945485.ZemF81RAkB@ralph.baldwin.cx> <98222.1409034192@critter.freebsd.dk> <201408261723.53428.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <201408261723.53428.jhb@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes: >> Hmm, now that I think about it, -n doesn't make sense because any >> one of the four keys can open the volume as needed to blow away the >> masterkey. >> >> The manual page should just be fixed. > >Should the '-n -1' just be removed? I.e., is 'gbde destroy' sufficient to >destroy all copies of the key? (Sorry about previous empty reply) Yes, the -n isn't needed because it doesn't operate on any specific key but all of them. This differs from for instance "setkey" where you may use key number 1 to set a new key number 2. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?78350.1409089889>