Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 13:22:20 +0000 (UTC) From: "Helmut Schneider" <jumper99@gmx.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn and/or portsnap Message-ID: <xn0i2vvey8hfrc002@news.gmane.org> References: <xn0i2vr1c2kufw000@news.gmane.org> <20120909130611.da2409e4.freebsd@edvax.de> <xn0i2vsd54cwlg001@news.gmane.org> <CADGWnjWK-KAnMzjp8j%2BHC4472J2fXSQ2qXOMUG68wida6eM9Bg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
C. P. Ghost wrote: > On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Helmut Schneider <jumper99@gmx.de> > wrote: > > Currently I'm updating ports and src twice a day so I will keep > > using svn for both. > > While you certainly can, isn't it a bit excessive to update so > frequently? Remember, it's not just fetching the sources and ports, > you must also compile world and ports if you want to stay current. I > highly doubt that you want to do this twice a day, even on a very > fast machine. I meant I fetch sources for src and ports twice a day. While ports helps me to track most recent changes src indeed might not require an update twice a day.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xn0i2vvey8hfrc002>