Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Feb 2024 19:28:10 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>,  "<dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org>" <dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org>,  "<dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org>" <dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: git: 0df5f65908dd - main - reboot: Implement zfs support
Message-ID:  <CANCZdfrdfN5xkPLR3BVhaw7%2BDOPeibwue%2BnA0sGq=JKMoVBrig@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <DA2564A0-1647-4610-B9EC-FDA8298755CA@freebsd.org>
References:  <202402121853.41CIrfdp030604@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <DA2564A0-1647-4610-B9EC-FDA8298755CA@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--000000000000e4a7c306113a2543
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024, 6:10=E2=80=AFPM Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@freebsd.org> w=
rote:

> On 12 Feb 2024, at 18:53, Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >
> > The branch main has been updated by imp:
> >
> > URL:
> https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3D0df5f65908dd1913212535e6c4dd4c7=
3ce19c305
> >
> > commit 0df5f65908dd1913212535e6c4dd4c73ce19c305
> > Author:     Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>
> > AuthorDate: 2024-02-12 18:45:37 +0000
> > Commit:     Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>
> > CommitDate: 2024-02-12 18:45:37 +0000
> >
> >    reboot: Implement zfs support
> >
> >    Implement full support for ZFS -k support. For ZFS, we have to set a
> >    property that gets cleared by the boot loaeder for whether or not to
> >    process nextboot.conf. Do this using system("zfsbootcfg..." rather
> than
> >    coding the small subset of that program inline to avoid CDDL
> >    contamination of reboot and the complications of disabling CDDL and/=
or
> >    ZFS. The few bytes needed to implement reboot for systems with zfs i=
s
> >    not worth saving for systems w/o ZFS.
>
> Can we at least use posix_spawn rather than system? The asprintf+system
> combo may in practice be safe, especially given the nature of this
> tool, but I don=E2=80=99t think it=E2=80=99s a great idea to be writing s=
ystem-using
> code in 2024 when it=E2=80=99s easy to avoid. That way nobody needs to st=
op and
> think carefully about whether the code is safe, because it is by
> construction.
>

News to me, but also the first time I've used system in 15 or 20 years...

Sure, I'll rework and add you to the reviewers. So TIL...

Warner

>

--000000000000e4a7c306113a2543
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto"><div><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" =
class=3D"gmail_attr">On Mon, Feb 12, 2024, 6:10=E2=80=AFPM Jessica Clarke &=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jrtc27@freebsd.org">jrtc27@freebsd.org</a>&gt; wrote:<=
br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;borde=
r-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 12 Feb 2024, at 18:53, Warner Lo=
sh &lt;imp@FreeBSD.org&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; The branch main has been updated by imp:<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; URL: <a href=3D"https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3D0df5f65908dd=
1913212535e6c4dd4c73ce19c305" rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blan=
k">https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3D0df5f65908dd1913212535e6c4dd4c=
73ce19c305</a><br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; commit 0df5f65908dd1913212535e6c4dd4c73ce19c305<br>
&gt; Author:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Warner Losh &lt;imp@FreeBSD.org&gt;<br>
&gt; AuthorDate: 2024-02-12 18:45:37 +0000<br>
&gt; Commit:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Warner Losh &lt;imp@FreeBSD.org&gt;<br>
&gt; CommitDate: 2024-02-12 18:45:37 +0000<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 reboot: Implement zfs support<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Implement full support for ZFS -k support. For ZFS, we ha=
ve to set a<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 property that gets cleared by the boot loaeder for whethe=
r or not to<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 process nextboot.conf. Do this using system(&quot;zfsboot=
cfg...&quot; rather than<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 coding the small subset of that program inline to avoid C=
DDL<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 contamination of reboot and the complications of disablin=
g CDDL and/or<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ZFS. The few bytes needed to implement reboot for systems=
 with zfs is<br>
&gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 not worth saving for systems w/o ZFS.<br>
<br>
Can we at least use posix_spawn rather than system? The asprintf+system<br>
combo may in practice be safe, especially given the nature of this<br>
tool, but I don=E2=80=99t think it=E2=80=99s a great idea to be writing sys=
tem-using<br>
code in 2024 when it=E2=80=99s easy to avoid. That way nobody needs to stop=
 and<br>
think carefully about whether the code is safe, because it is by<br>
construction.<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div =
dir=3D"auto">News to me, but also the first time I&#39;ve used system in 15=
 or 20 years...</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Sure, I&=
#39;ll rework and add you to the reviewers. So TIL...</div><div dir=3D"auto=
"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Warner=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto"><div clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .=
8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div></div></div>

--000000000000e4a7c306113a2543--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfrdfN5xkPLR3BVhaw7%2BDOPeibwue%2BnA0sGq=JKMoVBrig>