Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 22:23:10 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Eric Joyner <ricera10@gmail.com>, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>, mike@karels.net, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Adding new media types to if_media.h Message-ID: <20150227192310.GR17947@glebius.int.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomX1FcyxbZWgg=U177NsXvLi0EBerJoXmN-uq7Vcoqbsw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20150226230031.GN17947@glebius.int.ru> <201502270417.t1R4H37Y058057@mail.karels.net> <CAJ-VmomX1FcyxbZWgg=U177NsXvLi0EBerJoXmN-uq7Vcoqbsw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:25:59PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: A> [snip] A> A> I think Mike's approach is good - it makes it easy to MFC to 10.2 A> since there's extended lifecycle stuff to do there - and then we can A> plan out how do the "betterer" fix after it's landed and churned A> things. ... and we will be ought to support the "betterer" fix along with the "not so betterer" for a very long time. The rock on which we split in this argument is that some developers write their code for stable/x and then forward-port it to head, focused on quality of result for stable/x; while other developers do the opposite: write code to head, then consider or not consider merging it stable/x. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150227192310.GR17947>