Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:20:43 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Dirk Froemberg <dirk@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/pdflib Makefile distinfo pkg-comment? pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/print/pdflib/files patch-ad patch-af Message-ID: <3B24633B.90403@FreeBSD.org> References: <200106101349.f5ADnRq34779@freefall.freebsd.org> <200106101535.f5AFZGo33428@mail.uic-in.net> <20010610184056.B76692@physik.TU-Berlin.DE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dirk Froemberg wrote: >Hi Maxim! > >On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 06:35:25PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >>On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 06:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Dirk Froemberg wrote: >> >>>dirk 2001/06/10 06:49:26 PDT >>> >>> Removed files: >>> print/pdflib Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr >>> pkg-plist >>> print/pdflib/files patch-ad patch-af >>> Log: >>> Remove pdflib in favour of pdflib3. >>> >>Huh, as far as I remember pdflib3 has far more restrictive >>license, so some users may still want to use old version (it >>is why we had two ports for pdflib). Have situation changed >>recently, or you simply missed this point? >> > >As far as I know you are right in regard to the license. > >But pdflib and pdflib3 installed some files with the same >name, i. e. pdflib and pdflib3 couldn't be installed both >and mod_php4 was the only port using pdflib... > >We'll see how many people will complain that pdflib is missing, >now. > I do not see why there was a necessity to remove the old one. Just adjust mod_php4 to depend on pdflib3 and leave pdflib alone for those who really need it. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B24633B.90403>