Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:12:22 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/postfix-gps Makefile Message-ID: <20050102231222.GA85287@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050102225314.GJ63708@k7.mavetju> References: <20050102064857.GA4047@frontfree.net> <20050102065949.GB6250@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050102070800.GA106@frontfree.net> <20050102071136.GD1436@k7.mavetju> <20050102071849.GA31292@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050102112037.GE1436@k7.mavetju> <20050102201818.GA42186@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050102213206.GI63708@k7.mavetju> <20050102223941.GA75006@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050102225314.GJ63708@k7.mavetju>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:53:14AM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 02:39:41PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:32:06AM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:18:18PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:20:37PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > > > The problem is that INDEX builds also need to set this or the > > > > > > dependency list will be all wrong. Doing this the obvious way = gives a > > > > > > huge slowdown. > > > > >=20 > > > > > What are the obvious ways? This is what I made in a galaxy far far > > > > > away when I still had the hope I could change the world. What is > > > > > does is when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined it sets the default WITH_ > > > > > and WITHOUT_ values are being set. > > > >=20 > > > > And that gives a huge slowdown, because of all the extra make/shell > > > > gunk that is processed 12000 times :) > > >=20 > > > I couldn't find a single shell command in this. > >=20 > > OK (I might have been confusing it with the slowdown that happened > > along with a previously-committed OPTIONS-related change) but did you > > benchmark it? >=20 > I would like to, but at this moment I'm not sure what and how: index builds, as mentioned above. Make sure to do it on a quiet system, run each test twice and discard the first measurement due to caching effects. Kris --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2H/WWry0BWjoQKURAq2iAJwNIt0H0wcIqVwNy2WvpxhS3sGnKwCfcMaq FrUFPFRkuM5tuOr5thz51JE= =j6FG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050102231222.GA85287>