Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 02:41:55 +0100 From: Tomek CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info> To: Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>, olce@freebsd.org, "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: noatime on ufs2 Message-ID: <CAFYkXjmAZF-UXS%2B8Acgb91JLo%2B5wtAp_NxtcxaHGMfPymn_%2Bpg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <202401110049.40B0ntj0046904@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> References: <F5D2BD92-5AC3-4B1E-8B47-A1F13D9FC677@yahoo.com> <202401110049.40B0ntj0046904@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 1:50=E2=80=AFAM Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > Olivier Certner wrote on > > Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:01:48 UTC : > > > What I'm saying is that, based on others' input so far, my own (long,= even if not as long as yours) experience and some late reflection, is that= "noatime" should be the default (everywhere, all mounts and all FSes), and= that working on "relatime" won't make any real difference for most users (= IOW, I think that developing "relatime" is a bad idea *in general*). And I = think this is a sufficiently reasonable conclusion that anyone with the sam= e inputs would conclude the same. So, if it's not the case, I would be inte= rested in knowing why, ideally. > > > > I never use atime, always noatime, for UFS. That said, I'd never propos= e > > changing the long standing defaults for commands and calls. I'd avoid: > > .. Very well said Mark ... > > Please folks stop tweaking defaults, especially long standing ones, > if you feel the need for noatime, set it, by all means, I have been > for 30 years.... > > .. what Mark said very well removed for brevity ... +1 :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFYkXjmAZF-UXS%2B8Acgb91JLo%2B5wtAp_NxtcxaHGMfPymn_%2Bpg>