Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 01:39:24 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org> To: Jay Chandler <lists@sequestered.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portsnap -- update claims "up to date" but it's not. Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.0.99999.0712260139070.45340@prime.gushi.org> In-Reply-To: <4771E0A0.60008@sequestered.net> References: <20071225234859.F75015@prime.gushi.org> <4771E0A0.60008@sequestered.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Jay Chandler wrote: > Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >> Maybe I'm just doing this completely wrong: >> >> prime# portsnap update >> Ports tree is already up to date. >> prime# portsnap fetch >> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap3.FreeBSD.org... done. >> Fetching snapshot metadata... done. >> Updating from Mon Nov 12 18:16:16 EST 2007 to Tue Dec 25 21:36:54 EST 2007. >> Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. >> Applying metadata patches... done. >> Fetching 4 metadata files... >> [and so on] >> >> Am I using this thing wrong? >> >> -Dan > > Yup. 'portsnap fetch update' is the command I use-- the reverse order that > you're using 'em in. Shouldn't I just need one of the two? -Dan -- "You can't call yourself a dork if you don't use UNIX!" -Dan Mahoney, May 1997 --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org ---------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.0.99999.0712260139070.45340>