Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:47:16 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Subject: Re: libthr and 1:1 threading. Message-ID: <20030402154716.GE790@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <3E8B03E6.36871704@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030402093336.34476D-100000@fledge.watson.org> <3E8B03E6.36871704@mindspring.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On (2003/04/02 07:38), Terry Lambert wrote: > Is the disk I/O really that big of an issue? All writes will > be on underlying non-blocking descriptors; I guess you are > saying that the interleaved I/O is more important, further > down the system call interface than the top, and this becomes > an issue? Dude, you should really try this stuff for yourself before naysaying performance improvements on principle. It's actually quite impressive for desktop users (at least). Ciao, Sheldon.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030402154716.GE790>
