Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 11:42:27 -0400 From: Winston Smith <smith.winston.101@gmail.com> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, Mark R V Murray <mark@grondar.org> Subject: Re: i2c on RPI-B not working Message-ID: <CADH-AwFz%2Bo5XuqaWuOZTSFsPmNQsYXbR_D4mLDJVyo2R6AZX5A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1398903188.22079.89.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <93181B67-1944-4DDD-A595-455D2AE9B110@grondar.org> <1CFC3564-65F0-4DC8-950C-3D53BBB2761C@FreeBSD.org> <CADH-AwFDk2uzOcNQQx%2BL%2BHGBgc7vccQVXLta_g6D3HRHhZxYsQ@mail.gmail.com> <1398903188.22079.89.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> The i2c eeproms, on the other hand, should just work. Add 'device icee'
> to the kernel config, and in the dts file make an icee entry that's a
> child of the i2c controller entry. Something like this (this is for
> wandboard)...
>
> i2c@021a4000
> {
> status = "okay";
> icee@a0 {
> compatible = "atmel,24c256";
> reg = <0xa0>;
> status = "okay";
> };
> };
>
> You'll end up with a /dev/icee0 device which you can read and write and
> seek and so on. Note that the device will show up even if the hardware
> isn't there or isn't responding, there's no actual probe for hardware.
> If you do "dd /dev/icee0 | hd" and it comes up all-bits-one that's
> usually a sign that there's no hardware (but it could also be a brand
> new eeprom with nothing written to it).
Is there an equivalent for an RTC?
I know Linux will detect a DS1307 on the I2C bus and map it to
/dev/rtcN from which the system can use the time?
Thanks!
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADH-AwFz%2Bo5XuqaWuOZTSFsPmNQsYXbR_D4mLDJVyo2R6AZX5A>