Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 22:32:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom <tom@sdf.com> To: Wes Peters <softweyr@xmission.com> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: supermicro p6sns/p6sas Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.971004223014.18544A-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <199710050255.UAA07165@obie.softweyr.ml.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 4 Oct 1997, Wes Peters wrote: > tom@sdf.com writes: > > Yes, I was just thinking about that. If gcc is randomly dying on older > > K6 processors, is it actually producing correct object code when it > > doesn't crash? > > Yes. It is producing correct code when it crashes, too. It just jumps > to the wrong address, which quickly leads to a crash. And that isn't going to lead to incorrect object code? I would not be that confident. It seems to that such a bug will eventually lead to situation where it makes a incorrect jump but doesn't crash. ... > happening inside the chips than you do inside the FreeBSD VM management > code. Hehe... making some assumptions again! > -- > "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" > > Wes Peters Softweyr LLC > http://www.xmission.com/~softweyr softweyr@xmission.com > > Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.971004223014.18544A-100000>