Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 21:30:40 -0700 From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> To: "Yuri A. Wolf" <subs@ovk.altai.ru> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ntp-4.0.99k23? Message-ID: <200104190431.f3J4V3S54698@cwsys.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 19 Apr 2001 11:21:53 %2B0700." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104191115090.22782-100000@proxy.obk.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104191115090.22782-100000@proxy.obk.ru>, "Yuri A. Wo lf" writes: > Hello > > After I upgraded to ntp-4.0.99k_2 I noted that ntp port changed again to > ntp-4.0.99k23. > > Is the 1st one vulnerable? Is the 2d one ok? Both are invulnerable. 4.0.99k_2 is patched by the port (see the files directory) to fix the vulnerability. 4.0.99k23 has the patches for the vulnerability built into it. In the end both are equivalent. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104190431.f3J4V3S54698>