Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 May 2018 16:19:54 +0200
From:      "Dries Michiels" <driesm.michiels@gmail.com>
To:        "'Andrey V. Elsukov'" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>, <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: kernel: in6_delayed_cksum: delayed m_pullup
Message-ID:  <000601d3e933$22a88630$67f99290$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <012401d3e875$9bd23a60$d376af20$@gmail.com>
References:  <5ae60f44.1c69fb81.ee4a5.1043@mx.google.com> <c4953cdd-faf9-21ac-1b1b-2fba817d0a2c@yandex.ru> <f537f8b4-07ad-8202-a17d-8b4a71aabe93@yandex.ru> <008101d3e86f$584fb930$08ef2b90$@gmail.com> <012401d3e875$9bd23a60$d376af20$@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> From: Dries Michiels <driesm.michiels@gmail.com>
>> Sent: donderdag 10 mei 2018 17:43
>> To: 'Andrey V. Elsukov' <bu7cher@yandex.ru>; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
>> Subject: RE: kernel: in6_delayed_cksum: delayed m_pullup
>> > Also, can you try this patch?
 > >
 > > --
 > > WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
>=20
> Ok error has returned:
> May 10 17:31:39 vados kernel: in6_delayed_cksum: delayed m_pullup, m-
> >len: 48 plen 68 off 56 csum_flags=3D400<CSUM_IP6_TCP> May 10 17:31:53
> vados last message repeated 3 times
>=20
> I'll apply the patch and rebuild from source to give an update later.

Patch applied fine, rebuilded world and kernel and installed both =
without any errors.=20
IPV6 performance is the same as before (maxing out my upstream =
connection in a speedtest).
And no more errors! But, couldn=E2=80=99t get any as its not in the code =
anymore after the patch.
Is this a patch that could get committed in STABLE?
Is there anything else I can test with respect to this patch?

>=20
> Dries




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000601d3e933$22a88630$67f99290$>