Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:40:09 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Jeff Laine <wtf.jlaine@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Underwood <djuatdelta@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for fast graphical web browser Message-ID: <20090811014009.46a70aee.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20090810225508.GA36580@free.bsd.loc> References: <20090731085553.461f73be.cyb.@gmx.net> <20090731114711.49d94196.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090731170422.0574fef5.cyb.@gmx.net> <20090731221532.ab004d5b.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090731205636.GB44613@kokopelli.hydra> <20090731231007.feec5a75.freebsd@edvax.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0908030825500.528@tripel.monochrome.org> <20090807061137.GA4290@kokopelli.hydra> <4A7C1AD3.5060503@rcn.com> <b6c05a470908070632p52aadb5bu81543afec5e0d464@mail.gmail.com> <20090810225508.GA36580@free.bsd.loc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:55:08 +0400, Jeff Laine <wtf.jlaine@gmail.com> wrote: > But now I'm pretty happy with that new firefox-3.5 which seems pretty > faster than previous version and still light enough for my old 1.6G > celeron-powered laptop. May I guess what I should consider light enough for my uber-old ancient 0.5G AMD powered laptop? :-) By the way: In order to find out which browser is *really* lightweight, fast and still easy to use, responsive and standard compliant, you should try running it on *really* old hardware. If it runs there good enough so you would use it, it will be blazing fast on your modern hardware of today. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090811014009.46a70aee.freebsd>