Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 09:56:07 +0100 From: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> To: mokhi <mokhi64@gmail.com>, <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: C11 conformance of casinl-like functions. Message-ID: <a09324e4-499c-00ac-c8e0-ee89f7c6bf64@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <CAByVWPUvbG78nUoxQQAOTTY9dJa1agjCZo9oO3dShv2U8Q=y0A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAByVWPUvbG78nUoxQQAOTTY9dJa1agjCZo9oO3dShv2U8Q=y0A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Mokhi, and others, Many thanks for the commit. Really appreciated :) It would be nice, if one of the experts could also update the Wiki page for numerics[1]. There have been some commits, also in 11.0-CURRENT, not mentioned by the Wiki until now. Best wishes, Rainer Hurling [1] https://wiki.freebsd.org/Numerics Am 08.02.2017 um 12:03 schrieb mokhi: > Hi. > > I recently saw bunch of PRs opened about C11 lack of conformance in > FreeBSD on Bugzilla, complaining cosinl, acosinl, ... not implemented. > > I've searched about these and I found documents about them too[2][3]. > Do you think we should implement them? Or standards doesn't have > suggestions on these? > > If yes (you think we should implement them), would you suggest simply > `strong aliasing symbols of FUNC_l to FUNC`? or implementing FUNC_l > from scratch? > > I've made some patch based on my idea of aliasing symbols, If you > agree I like to work on this and probably can start a review on > phabricator for that. > > > Thanks and best wishes, Mokhi. > ========================================== > [2] https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/gnulib.html > [3] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/casinhl.html > and many more like this on opengroup.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a09324e4-499c-00ac-c8e0-ee89f7c6bf64>