Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 11:21:53 +0800 From: "David Xu" <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: "Daniel Eischen" <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpthread patch Message-ID: <005201c303c7$53a344d0$f001a8c0@davidw2k> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304152253300.25176-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Daniel Eischen" <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: "David Xu" <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>; ""Craig Rodrigues"" = <rodrigc@attbi.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 10:58 AM Subject: Re: libpthread patch > On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Xu wrote: >=20 > > ----- Original Message -----=20 > > From: "Daniel Eischen" <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> > > To: "David Xu" <davidxu@freebsd.org> > > Cc: <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>; "Craig Rodrigues" = <rodrigc@attbi.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 5:26 AM > > Subject: Re: libpthread patch > >=20 > I thought it might also be the UTS trying to interrupt > the thread (kse_thr_interruot) while it was in the kernel > (assuming the UTS did get the signal). >=20 kse_thr_interrupt would cause that thread return EINTR, it should get -1 not zero.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005201c303c7$53a344d0$f001a8c0>