Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:37:59 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        kpneal@pobox.com
Cc:        "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org>, J David <j.david.lists@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: zfs_enable vs zfs_load in loader.conf (but neither works)
Message-ID:  <5236A747.5020303@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130916044235.GA42673@neutralgood.org>
References:  <CABXB=RTz6jM=B895Bo6Kp-ZAf2pvTZkm-HfS=PrfX=aMKqjMbw@mail.gmail.com> <523310E2.4050702@FreeBSD.org> <52331179.4030201@FreeBSD.org> <CABXB=RR%2B5toQjRJRuf2yuj1updnTn1FqWnckn6fX4N%2BSr_6T4g@mail.gmail.com> <20130916044235.GA42673@neutralgood.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 16/09/2013 07:42 kpneal@pobox.com said the following:
> What happens if mountpoint is inherited instead of being set to one of
> those two values?

Would you like to test this and tell us?

I am 99.9% confident that mountpoint and canmount properties are never examined
in kernel.  They are honored only by zfs(8) utility.  Thus, they can not
possibly influence root mounting.  Modulo very very very obscure bugs, of course.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5236A747.5020303>