Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 14:11:36 +0100 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, George Abdelmalik <gabdelmalik@uniridge.com.au>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dtc(1): reproducible segmentation fault Message-ID: <DC171BE3-F6BF-4103-BFB6-F08E8FE4A055@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <2D772151-85F9-4D80-8074-58CD11FFF778@FreeBSD.org> References: <562A3FE5.8020809@uniridge.com.au> <F6FF4D7B-C380-4410-8A4D-6E376DF76C7D@gmail.com> <1445618437.91534.13.camel@freebsd.org> <2D772151-85F9-4D80-8074-58CD11FFF778@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24 Oct 2015, at 11:07, David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > On 23 Oct 2015, at 17:40, Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>=20 >> Don't cc me. I looked at the in-tree dtc code once and decided it's >> too flawed to try to maintain, and it supports only a subset of the >> full dts syntax. That's why we switched back to using the gnu dtc = for >> buildkernel. But I just discovered that for some reason gnu is not = the >> copy of dtc that gets installed, it's just the one that gets used >> during a buildkernel. >=20 > Please assign the bug to me. Actually, it looks as if this is one of the (many) bugs in dtc that I = fixed in a bunch of changes that I made (and didn=E2=80=99t get around = to committing) last Christmas (https://github.com/davidchisnall/dtc). = Patrick Wildt tested the version that I was working on with a load of = things from the GPL dtc test suite and they all passed. I=E2=80=99m now = running a make universe with the new version, and I=E2=80=99ll commit if = there are no problems. David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DC171BE3-F6BF-4103-BFB6-F08E8FE4A055>