Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:55:56 -0700 From: James Earl <james@icionline.ca> To: Peter Ulrich Kruppa <root@pukruppa.de> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP TESTERS: New GNOME upgrade script available Message-ID: <1074106556.59003.37.camel@work> In-Reply-To: <20040114192421.W2366@pukruppa.net> References: <1073782842.70574.17.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20040114061851.X2366@pukruppa.net> <1074097078.59003.3.camel@work> <1074102043.774.12.camel@gyros> <1074102831.59003.9.camel@work> <20040114192421.W2366@pukruppa.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 11:43, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, James Earl wrote: > > > On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 10:40, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 11:17, James Earl wrote: > > > > The GNOME Development Branch FAQ seems to give a little insight into > > > > some of the problems people may encounter with the Development version. > > > > > > If you have more suggestions, please let us know. > > > > > > Joe > > > > I wish I would've read the Dev. FAQ before trying out 2.5.2... I like to > > see the pretty icons! ;) > Please mind: Joe asked to test gome_upgrade.sh and send comments. > I did test it and mailed what happened. > If people were happy spending their time reading docs, faqs and > mans there wouldn't be any need to work on a GUI with clicky-icons. > We could stay with the console and type latex documents. Hi Peter, I agree, that's a good point. I guess that's probably why I didn't read it. In case it came across this way... I didn't mean to suggest you needed to read the FAQ. James
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1074106556.59003.37.camel>