Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 23:43:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com>, coredump@nervosa.com, winter@jurai.net, freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: editors Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960522233909.26002D-100000@thurston.eng.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <199605230328.UAA06238@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 May 1996, Terry Lambert wrote: > > So in other words, if there is room on the boot disk for two editors, one > > of which being vi, what do you vote for as the second editor? > > ex. 8-) Et tu, Terry? This is getting a little frustrating. I am NOT suggesting replacing your favorite editor (ex, Terry, really?). I am talking about replacing the newbie editor, ee, with one that is universally useable by anyone without training, pico. This isn't for me, or most likely for ANYONE currently subscribed to this list. It's strictly for new users, and those just learning unix. Sheesh. ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and n3lxx, both FreeBSD (301) 220-2114 | version 2.2 current -- and great FUN! ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.91.960522233909.26002D-100000>