Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 22:16:21 +0200 From: Dario Freni <saturnero@freesbie.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [saturnero@freesbie.org: Weird behaviour of mount_unionfs with executables] Message-ID: <20050703201621.GD89744@cvs.freesbie.org> In-Reply-To: <42C83643.4010506@samsco.org> References: <20050703181616.GC89744@cvs.freesbie.org> <42C83643.4010506@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:02:27PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > >I'm also afraid that copying files to the upper layer also when > >they're not modified could fill up our mfs entirely. I'm almost sure > >there's a totally different behaviour under RELENG_5, as we haven't > >encountered such problems. > > > > >=20 > You might very well have found a bug in the vnode pager. I take it that > this doesn't happen on 5-STABLE, correct? Correct. I'm sure that from 5.4-RELEASE to -STABLE unionfs work as expected for me. The very strange thing is that a recalled file is copied (with fixed permissions) to the upper layer even if it wasn't modified. In my case, the upper layer is a mdmfs, so it will be surely filled up to its entire size after running executables for a total amount of 32Mb. Quite boring. Bye, Dario --=20 Dario Freni (saturnero@freesbie.org) FreeSBIE developer (http://www.freesbie.org) GPG Public key at http://www.saturnero.net/saturnero.asc --q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCyEeUymi72IiShysRAnxXAKD7HEAWAgPZc+oe/Y2+ix//QDjqaQCfUHJi ImdhmabGMI+LNiam4n5lqME= =waz7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050703201621.GD89744>