Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 08:10:35 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, scottl@samsco.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/amd Makefile.inc src/usr.sbin/amd/amd Makefile src/usr.sbin/amd/include config.h Message-ID: <29826.1123395035@phk.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 06 Aug 2005 19:11:38 MDT." <20050806.191138.104336036.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20050806.191138.104336036.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: >Agreed. I was going to write up a patch that will remove this >confusion and respect the current way of doing NO_FOO from a user's >perspective. I thought we had settled on the NO_FOO being boolean and didn't want to disturb that for additive features (like HESIOD now is). As long as we don't get double negatives (ie: NO_FOO=no vs NO_FOO=yes) I'm OK with it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?29826.1123395035>