Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Jul 2003 01:25:06 -0700
From:      David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.org>
To:        David Xu <davidxu@viatech.com.cn>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpthread/thread thr_attr_get_np.c thr_cancel.c thr_getschedparam.c thr_join.c thr_mutex_prioceiling.c thr_sigaction.c thr_sigmask.c thr_sigpending.c thr_sigsuspend.c
Message-ID:  <20030707082506.GA90638@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <001c01c3444f$7c904280$f001a8c0@davidw2k>
References:  <200307070428.h674SNfq092785@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030707060318.GA28281@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <001c01c3444f$7c904280$f001a8c0@davidw2k>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003, David Xu wrote:
> > > davidxu     2003/07/06 21:28:23 PDT
> > > 
> > >   FreeBSD src repository
> > > 
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     lib/libpthread/thread thr_attr_get_np.c thr_cancel.c 
> > >                           thr_getschedparam.c thr_join.c 
> > >                           thr_mutex_prioceiling.c thr_sigaction.c 
> > >                           thr_sigmask.c thr_sigpending.c 
> > >                           thr_sigsuspend.c 
> > >   Log:
> > >   Avoid accessing user provided parameters in critical region.
> > 
> > Cool.  What happens if a page fault is taken in a critical region?
> > Does this merely make the KSE unusable by other threads until the
> > page is faulted in, or does it deadlock the UTS?  (If the latter
> > is true, you'd need to wire a stack page or two to ensure
> > correctness, or do soemthing differently.)
> >
> 
> The change is nothing to do with page fault, also page fault
> shouldn't cause deadlock. It is true the kse can not be used
> by other threads if page fault occurs while in critical region.
> For normal page fault not in critical region, kernel KSE codes
> still does not call thread_user_enter(), but I want to insert
> such call in trap.c, so when a page fault occurs, and thread
> is blocked in paging, other threads still can run in userland,
> if a user thread is in kernel mode, it is not affected.

That's what I was talking about.  If you enter the UTS upon taking
a page fault, you have to be sure that the page that faulted
didn't belong to the UTS itself, or you at least have to have some
way of breaking the loop.  But since the UTS is unaware of page
faults presently, I guess this isn't a problem yet.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030707082506.GA90638>