Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:35:21 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: James Ryan <james@infinityprosports.com> Cc: isp@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftpd vs. lukemftpd (forcing FTP-uploaded ...) Message-ID: <200607171535.21813.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <44BBE21B.8070606@infinityprosports.com> References: <200607171306.01882.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <200607171427.26699.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <44BBE21B.8070606@infinityprosports.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
понед╕лок 17 липень 2006 15:16, James Ryan написав: > If you don't mind waiting until the file finishes transferring to > examine it But I do, actually. The files we deal with measure in gigabytes, and take a while to transfer even over fat pipes. Rejecting the uncompressed ones right away is better, than after the initiator has come back from his lunch. > This means you can make a convenient string to regex, such as "date|user| > action|file". With any kind of post-transfer verification, there is no reliable way to notify the user of his/her failure... I think, the quick rejection should delivered via the FTProtocol itself, so the user's FTP-client shows it -- instantly. -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607171535.21813.mi%2Bmx>