Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:53:20 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, alc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nginx and FreeBSD11 Message-ID: <20160922085320.GQ38409@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20160922083424.GY2840@zxy.spb.ru> References: <2122051.7RxZBKUSFc@ralph.baldwin.cx> <20160920065244.GO2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160920192053.GP2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160920201925.GI38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20160920203853.GR2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160920211517.GJ38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20160922075933.GL38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20160922082527.GX2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160922082740.GN38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20160922083424.GY2840@zxy.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:34:24AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:27:40AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:25:27AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:59:33AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > Below is, I believe, the committable fix, of course supposing that > > > > the patch above worked. If you want to retest it on stable/11, ignore > > > > efirt.c chunks. > > > > > > and remove patch w/ spinlock? > > Yes. > > What you prefer now -- I am test spinlock patch or this patch? > For success in any case need wait 2-3 days. If you already run previous (spinlock) version for 1 day, then finish with it. I am confident that spinlock version results are indicative for the refined patch as well. If you did not applied the spinlock variant at all, there is no reason to spend efforts on it, use the patch I sent today.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160922085320.GQ38409>