Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 00:28:02 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, nate@mt.sri.com, hsu@clinet.fi, dg@Root.COM, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/926 Message-ID: <199610222228.AAA20456@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199610222214.QAA24663@rocky.mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Oct 22, 96 04:14:48 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Nate Williams wrote: > > > It's in the source, but not in the man-page. > > > > Because it's deprecated. > Are you supposed to add -b to the flags in /etc/fstab? I'm confused, > since I thought you were supposed to have old-style flags. Yep, uncle:/usr /uncle/usr nfs rw,intr,bg 0 0 is identical to uncle:/usr /uncle/usr nfs rw,-i,-b 0 0 I'm not completely certain whether this would work (i remember some old discussion about some brokeness with the `=' char): uncle:/usr /uncle/usr nfs rw,-i,-b,-r=1024,-w=1024 0 0 -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610222228.AAA20456>