Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:02:12 -0600 From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: r244114 ia64: make check-old-libs says /lib/libz.so.5 can be removed, but it is still needed by /usr/sbin/dtrace and /usr/sbin/lockstat Message-ID: <CACdU%2Bf-3W3LJy-607VN5oo66jmd-jPFpQBaqdqy0NWApFeBKCg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CACdU%2Bf_XthNDpdz2D8p685_1XiymrfpEpbiATcn==-Uia4y0xw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201212121007.qBCA7Hu9028406@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <CACdU%2Bf_XthNDpdz2D8p685_1XiymrfpEpbiATcn==-Uia4y0xw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: >> I updated to r244114 on ia64 following the >> standard procedure. I then get: >> >> # make check-old-libs >>>>> Checking for old libraries >> /lib/libz.so.5 >> # >> >> while sysutils/libchk shows: >> >> Binaries that are linked with: /lib/libz.so.5 >> /usr/sbin/dtrace >> /usr/sbin/lockstat >> >> and indeed these two executables depend >> on this library: >> >> # ldd /usr/sbin/dtrace >> /usr/sbin/dtrace: >> libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000) >> libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000) >> libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000) >> libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000) >> libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000) >> libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x2000000020246000) >> libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2000000020294000) >> # ldd /usr/sbin/lockstat >> /usr/sbin/lockstat: >> libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000) >> libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000) >> libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000) >> libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000) >> libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000) >> librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 (0x2000000020246000) >> libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x200000002025e000) >> libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x20000000202ac000) >> # >> >> I see that these two executables are old: >> >> # ls -al /usr/sbin/dtrace /usr/sbin/lockstat >> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 58976 Jul 18 2010 /usr/sbin/dtrace >> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 72832 Jul 18 2010 /usr/sbin/lockstat >> # >> >> Does this mean that both dtrace and lockstat >> are obsolete and can be removed? >> > These 2 programs are part of the CDDL liscensed code. > > Do you have WITHOUT_CDDL defined in your src.conf or make.conf? If it > is defined, then you can remove them. Otherwise you'll need to > determine why they are not being built/installed. > I had another look at cddl/usr.sbin/Makefile, and it only builds lockstat and dtrace for i386, amd64, and powerpc. It doesn't build them for ia64. So it is safe to remove them. -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamedi while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACdU%2Bf-3W3LJy-607VN5oo66jmd-jPFpQBaqdqy0NWApFeBKCg>