Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:31:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fts_open() (was: Re: Patch to restore WARNS feature) Message-ID: <200106131631.MAA02852@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010613115530.Y1832@superconductor.rush.net> References: <20010613153416.B21292@sunbay.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106132318410.67996-100000@besplex.bde.org> <200106131516.LAA02178@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20010613182157.A12432@sunbay.com> <200106131551.LAA02550@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20010613115530.Y1832@superconductor.rush.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:55:30 -0400, Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net> said: > Why not do something like the rpc code does? Check if threaded, if > so cons up a thread specific key otherwise use a global. The Standard does not appear to say whether qsort() is reentrant, but I believe that it ought to be. fts() was clearly intended to be reentrant. (I don't know what good it would do, but let's not make things worse than they already are, hey?) -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106131631.MAA02852>