Date: 15 Jan 2005 10:40:49 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: freebsd <freebsd@beke.info> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bimap instead of public ip and servers Message-ID: <44oefqvgxq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <20050114184915.GB1802@beke.info> References: <20050114184915.GB1802@beke.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
freebsd <freebsd@beke.info> writes: > Hi all, > i have a following problem, probably someone was through this before and > can offer advice. > Now i'm using DSL with static ip address and on my home FreeBSD server > there is group of servers serving my family and friends. Servers are qmail, > djbdns and apache. > I'm doing dns for my domain, mail server and http is also under my full > control. > Now i found cheaper option, but... > Instead of public static ip i'll have only bimap. Provider don't want to > route my public address into his LAN, because he don't want to waste > additional public ip's. Now i have a problem. > I'm not sure, if it will be possible to run DNS server, mail server and > web server in this enviroment. Just now i found, that qmail first checks > if his ip is resolved MX record for domain it's serving and refuses to > start, if it's not. And i'm bimapped, so it's not ;-). > I'll play with this during a weekend, but if someone can help, i'd be > gratefull. > Maybe this is not exactly FreeBSD problem, hope you don't mind ;-). I don't know anything about qmail particularly, but if you're running your own DNS, you should be able to report anything you want to the DNS queries of your own mail daemon...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44oefqvgxq.fsf>