Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 04:22:11 -0800 From: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.ORG> To: jared nied <jnied@southampton.liu.edu> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OS X vs. Darwin Message-ID: <20030308042211.L79531@freebsdmall.com> In-Reply-To: <3464BCFE-4FD2-11D7-A6E7-000393BB8320@southampton.liu.edu>; from jnied@southampton.liu.edu on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:50:27AM -0500 References: <3464BCFE-4FD2-11D7-A6E7-000393BB8320@southampton.liu.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:50:27AM -0500, jared nied wrote: > You say in 'Explaining BSD' that OS X is a closed-source BSD, with only > the kernel open-sourced. Darwin is an entirely functional BSD OS for > x86 and PPCs > (http://developer.apple.com/darwin/projects/darwin/faq.html); the > Aqua/Quartz graphics system is closed-source. I'm just curious why you > don't make that distinction; do you have problems with the APSL as well > (I don't mean that the way it sounds..)? No, this is an oversight. The text in that article should be corrected. - Murray [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE+aeBytNcQog5FH30RAv5MAKCpD1L+T+VVYbJ7ctsLLHp5HwifRQCfYgFD 7XnpzM/QoYH9Pt3Nf97KRxw= =qWdQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030308042211.L79531>