Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 11:38:48 +0700 (NOVST) From: "Yuri A. Wolf" <subs@ovk.altai.ru> To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ntp-4.0.99k23? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104191136090.22782-100000@proxy.obk.ru> In-Reply-To: <200104190431.f3J4V3S54698@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > Is the 1st one vulnerable? Is the 2d one ok? > > Both are invulnerable. 4.0.99k_2 is patched by the port (see the files > directory) to fix the vulnerability. 4.0.99k23 has the patches for the > vulnerability built into it. In the end both are equivalent. > Ok, thank you. Those differences in files directory was the reason of my question. -- Yuri Wolf wolf@ovk.altai.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0104191136090.22782-100000>