Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:30:50 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: threads@freebsd.org, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Patch] C1X threading support Message-ID: <60233.1324315850@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:09:53 MST." <AC4BCD04-6555-4AD1-BBCD-3C706852ECCF@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <AC4BCD04-6555-4AD1-BBCD-3C706852ECCF@bsdimp.com>, Warner Losh write s: >There's a lot of prior art for the committee to choose from. Same thing for struct packing to match a protocol specification. And as for assert_mutex_held() I belive some of the prior art is only a few hours longer than the word "mutex". I really wonder what they think they are trying to do some times... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?60233.1324315850>