Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:58:07 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Daichi GOTO <daichi@ongs.co.jp> Subject: Re: fcntl always fails to delete lock file, and PID is always -6464 Message-ID: <AANLkTinPM3ShWiDWg-4o-aApMG9znG-DAOd8usbpyquR@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTine%2B7_vqNjS4ztu6tSVEqaWLEAu%2B9PS-07z26PU@mail.gmail.com> References: <20101004123725.65d09b9e.daichi@ongs.co.jp> <AANLkTinZg3n3wDUzQFPv_Gq1o2hswGL3%2B4o0brmTi0-h@mail.gmail.com> <20101004144927.36822f07.daichi@ongs.co.jp> <AANLkTimVcLVdULyAAJD-_TaC5OLj%2BaZVNa=%2BSaiN6PKv@mail.gmail.com> <20101005093826.17432b1e.daichi@ongs.co.jp> <AANLkTi=w5ZAfRymSYbL6X37uyYX17J2dW8LHVcPXZ_%2Bb@mail.gmail.com> <20101005153410.598e4484.daichi@ongs.co.jp> <AANLkTin=9MKZGf7RREfcReamdJpCQ56BMn_RKy8eOU0-@mail.gmail.com> <20101005175536.a67998ae.daichi@ongs.co.jp> <AANLkTine%2B7_vqNjS4ztu6tSVEqaWLEAu%2B9PS-07z26PU@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Daichi GOTO <daichi@ongs.co.jp> wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:23:02 -0700 >> Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>> 2010/10/4 Daichi GOTO <daichi@ongs.co.jp>: >>> > Thanks nice test tool :) =C2=A0And at last I got it excepting one mys= tery! >>> > >>> > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:17:08 -0700 >>> > Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>> >> Following through the same process on FreeBSD... >>> >> >>> >> Window 1: >>> >> $ ls -l /tmp/lockfile >>> >> ls: /tmp/lockfile: No such file or directory >>> >> $ ./test_fcntl >>> >> >>> >> Window 2: >>> >> >>> >> $ ls -l /tmp/lockfile >>> >> -rwsr-x--- =C2=A01 garrcoop =C2=A0wheel =C2=A00 Oct =C2=A04 20:14 /t= mp/lockfile >>> >> $ ./test_fcntl >>> >> test_fcntl: fcntl: Resource temporarily unavailable >>> > >>> > Just my mystery is as follow: >>> > >>> > Windows 1: >>> > % ./test_fcntl >>> > My pid: 43490 >>> > >>> > Windows 2: >>> > % ls -l /tmp/lockfile >>> > -r-sr-x--- =C2=A01 daichi =C2=A0wheel =C2=A00 10=E6=9C=88 =C2=A05 15:= 02 /tmp/lockfile =C2=A0 =C2=A0<--- is it weird, isn't it? >>> > % ./test_fcntl >>> > test_fcntl: open: Permission denied >>> > % >>> > >>> > Oops... What's wrong... /tmp is as follow: >>> > >>> > % mount | grep tmp >>> > /dev/ada0s1f on /tmp (ufs, local, noatime, soft-updates) >>> > % dumpfs /tmp | grep journal >>> > flags =C2=A0 soft-updates+journal >>> > % >>> > >>> > And working scene: >>> > >>> > Windows 2: >>> > % chmod u+w /tmp/lockfile >>> > % ls -l /tmp/lockfile >>> > -rwsr-x--- =C2=A01 daichi =C2=A0wheel =C2=A00 10=E6=9C=88 =C2=A05 15:= 22 /tmp/lockfile >>> > % ./test_fcntl >>> > My pid: 43646 >>> > test_fcntl: fcntl[1]: Resource temporarily unavailable >>> > PID=3D43490 has the lock >>> > % >>> >>> What's your umask and what are the permissions on /tmp? >> >> % ll / | grep tmp >> drwxrwxrwt =C2=A014 root =C2=A0wheel =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A01024 10=E6=9C= =88 =C2=A05 17:19 tmp >> % umask >> 022 >> % rm -f test >> % touch test >> % ll | grep test >> -rw-r--r-- =C2=A0 1 daichi =C2=A0wheel =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 10=E6=9C=88 =C2= =A05 17:52 test >> % > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0The permissions look ok from my perspective, but the umask i= s > different, so you might want to try my umask to make sure that your > results match mine (and we need to check the requirements to determine > whether or not the behavior for FreeBSD's umask syscall is correct): > > $ ls -la /tmp/ | head -n 2 > total 462686 > drwxrwxrwt =C2=A051 root =C2=A0 =C2=A0 wheel =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = 11776 Oct =C2=A05 03:11 . > $ umask > 0022 > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Where and how is /tmp mounted (is it a real partition, what > filesystem, etc)? > =C2=A0 =C2=A0BTW, when I change my umask to match your's I don't get the = same > results you do on my home machine: > > Window 1: > > $ umask 022 > $ ./test_fcntl > My pid: 17353 > > Window 2: > > $ ./test_fcntl > My pid: 17356 > test_fcntl: fcntl[1]: Resource temporarily unavailable > PID=3D17353 has the lock > $ ls -l /tmp/lockfile > -rwSr----- =C2=A01 gcooper =C2=A0wheel =C2=A00 Oct =C2=A05 07:49 /tmp/loc= kfile > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Just to note, the tests before were run on the RHEL 4.8 box = with > the following info, and the FreeBSD box with the following info: > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 8) > Linux sjc-lds-102 2.6.9-89.0.11.ELsmp #1 SMP Mon Aug 31 11:00:34 EDT > 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > FreeBSD bioshock.cisco.com 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #1 > r211767M: Sat Aug 28 00:28:45 PDT 2010 > garrcoop@bioshock.cisco.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BIOSHOCK =C2=A0amd64 > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0The tests above were run on a FreeBSD box with the following= info: > > FreeBSD bayonetta.local 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #9 r211309M: > Thu Aug 19 22:50:36 PDT 2010 > root@bayonetta.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BAYONETTA =C2=A0amd64 > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0On bayonetta /tmp is SUJ backed (probably should change that > though), and on bioshock it's not SUJ backed. And while this might be a good mental exercise, I think we're missing the original point of your bug: You were getting ECONNREFUSED because a socket was in `use', even though all instances of mozc_server were dead (at least that's the case with me). So the question I guess that's worth asking is: 1. What process/application does it need to establish a Unix style socket w= ith? 2. Why isn't that socket being cleaned up by the OS at exit? Thanks! -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinPM3ShWiDWg-4o-aApMG9znG-DAOd8usbpyquR>